Statistics

    Map

Twitter

Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides
( Vol-5,Issue-9,September 2018 )
Author(s):

Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva

Keywords:

Phytotoxicity, Sorghum bicolor, pre-emergence.

Abstract:

Imazethapyr, sulfentrazone, clomazone, diclosulam, trifloxysulfuron-sodium and trifluralin are residual herbicides commonly used for weed control in soybean or sugarcane crops. The sorghum crop implanted succeeding sugarcane, can be affected by the carryover effect of these herbicides. In this context, we aim with this work to evaluate the minimum period between application of herbicides with residual effect (imazethapyr, sulfentrazone, clomazone, diclosulam, trifluralin and trifloxysulfuron-sodium) and the planting of sorghum so that there is no impairment in growth and establishment of this crop due to the herbicide carryover effect. The experiment was installed in randomized blocks design with four replications, under field conditions. The herbicides were applied to the previously tillaged soil, with sorghum being planted 0, 14, 28, 42, 56 and 70 days after herbicide application (DAA). The percentage of germination was evaluated daily from planting, and 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after emergence (DAE) of each planting, the phytotoxicity was evaluated. Thirty five DAE of each planting season, ten plants were collected per plot for measurement of leaf area, fresh and dry mass of plants, leaves and stems. The minimum time interval for planting sorghum after application of these herbicides varies, but imazethapyr is highlighted by causing high and durable toxicity to sorghum even when planting sorghum after 70 days of its application.

ijaers doi crossref DOI:

10.22161/ijaers.5.9.35

Paper Statistics:
  • Total View : 35
  • Downloads : 11
  • Page No: 296-304
Cite this Article:
MLA
Germani Concenço et al ."Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides". International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science(ISSN : 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O)),vol 5, no. 9, 2018, pp.296-304 AI Publications, doi:10.22161/ijaers.5.9.35
APA
Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva(2018).Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science(ISSN : 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O)),5(9), 296-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.9.35
Chicago
Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva. 2018,"Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides". International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science(ISSN : 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O)).5(9):296-304. Doi: 10.22161/ijaers.5.9.35
Harvard
Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva. 2018,Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science(ISSN : 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O)).5(9), pp:296-304
IEEE
Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva."Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides", International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science(ISSN : 2349-6495(P) | 2456-1908(O)),vol.5,no. 9, pp.296-304,2018.
Bibtex
@article {germaniconcenço2018sweet,
title={Sweet Sorghum Establishment after Application of Residual Herbicides},
author={Germani Concenço, André Andres, Fábio Schreiber, Waggner Gomes Palharini, Matheus Bastos Martins, Ivana Santos Moisinho, Thais Stradioto Melo, Laryssa Barbosa Xavier da Silva},
journal={International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science},
volume={5},
year= {2018},
}
Share:
References:

[1] Almodares A., Hadi MR. (2009). Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4, 772 780.
[2] Artuzi, JP; Contiero, RL. (2006). Herbicidas aplicados na soja e produtividade do milho em sucessão. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41, 1119 1123.
[3] Avila, LA et al. (2010). Retorno da produção de arroz irrigado com cultivares convencionais após o uso do sistema Clearfield®. Planta Daninha, 28, 123 129.
[4] Brighenti, AM et al. (2002). Persistência e fitotoxicidade do herbicida atrazine aplicado na cultura do milho sobre a cultura do girassol em sucessão. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 20, 291 297.
[5] Cole, MR et al. (2017). Cultivar and maturity effects on the quality attributes and ethanol potential of sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy, 96, 183 192.
[6] Dan, HA et al. (2010). Residual activity of herbicides used in soybean agriculture on grain sorghum crop succession. Planta Daninha, 28, 1087 1095.
[7] Dan, HA et al. (2011). Atividade residual de herbicidas pré-emergentes aplicados na cultura da soja sobre o milheto cultivado em sucessão. Planta Daninha, 29, 437 445.
[8] Dan, HA, Dan, LGM, Barroso, ALM, Oliveira Neto, AM, Guerra, N. (2012). Resíduos de herbicidas utilizados na cultura da soja sobre o milho cultivado em sucessão. Caatinga, 25, 86 91.
[9] Durães FOM. (2011). Sorgo sacarino: desenvolvimento de tecnologia agronômica. Agroenergia em Revista, 3, 7 8.
[10] Francisco, PRM et al. (2016). Climatic aptitude for sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in Paraíba state, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, 9, 1043 1057.
[11] Grichar, WJ et al. (2004). Cotton response to imazapic and imazethapyr residues following peanut. The Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resource, 17, 1 8.
[12] Inoue, MH et al. (2011). Efeito residual de herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência em diferentes solos. Planta Daninha, 29, 429 435.
[13] IUPAC - International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. (2018). Agrochemical Information, The A to Z of Active Ingredients. Pesticide Properties Database.
[14] Karam, D. (2005). Efeito residual dos herbicidas aplicados na cultura da soja no milho safrinha em sucessão. VII Seminário Nacional de Milho Safrinha. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo.
[15] Lourenço, MEV et al. (2007). Potencialidades do sorgo sacarino [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] para a produção sustentável de bioetanol no Alentejo. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 30, 103 110.
[16] Machado, FG et al. (2016). Performance of herbicides for weed control in sorghum. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas, 15, 281 289.
[17] Maladão, JC et al. (2013). Susceptibilidade de espécies de plantas com potencial de fitorremediação do herbicida sulfentrazone. Ceres, 60, 111 121.
[18] May, A, Durães, FOM, Pereira Filho, IA, Schaffert, RE, Parrella, RAC. (2012). Sistema Embrapa de produção agroindustrial de sorgo sacarino para bioetanol sistema BRS1G – tecnologia qualidade Embrapa. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo.
[19] Merotto Jr, A, Vidal, RA. (2001). Herbicidas inibidores de Protox. In: Vidal, RA, Merotto Jr, A (Ed.). Herbicidologia. Porto Alegre: Evangraf.
[20] Monquero, PA. (2014). Manejo de plantas daninhas nas culturas agrícolas. São Carlos: RiMa.
[21] Oliveira Jr, RS et al. (1999). Spatial variability of imazethapyr sorption in soil. Weed Science, 47, 243 248.
[22] Pinto, JJO et al. (2011). Atividade residual de imazethapyr + imazapic em arroz semeado em rotação com o arroz Clearfield®. Planta Daninha, 29, 205-216.
[23] R Core Team. (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation.
[24] Silva, AA, Vivian, R, Oliveira Jr., RS. (2007). Herbicidas: comportamento no solo. In: Silva, AA, Silva, JF (Eds.). Tópicos em manejo de plantas daninhas. Viçosa: UFV. pp. 189 248.
[25] Silva, AA et al. (1999). Efeito residual no solo dos herbicidas imazamox e imazethapyr para as culturas de milho e sorgo. Planta Daninha, 17, 345 354.
[26] Souza, CC et al. (2005). Produtividade do Sorgo granífero cv. sacarino e qualidade de produtos formulados isoladamente ou combinados ao caldo de cana-de-açúcar. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 25, 512 517.
[27] Stougaard, N, Shea, PJ, Martin, AR. (1990). Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Science, 38, 67 73.
[28] Ulbrich, AV, Souza, JRP, Shaner, DE. (2005). Persistence and carryover effect of imazapic and imazapyr in Brazilian cropping systems. Weed Technology, 19, 986 991.
[29] Vencill, WD. (2002). Herbicide handbook. Lawrence: Weed Science Society of. America.
[30] Werle, R et al. Modeling shattercane dynamics in herbicide-tolerant grain sorghum cropping systems. Ecological Modelling, 343, 131 141.