The Effectiveness of Discovery Based Learning Implementation through Improving Students’ Innovative thinking Skills in solving Open-Ended Task of Pattern Generalization

S. N. Azizah, Dafik, Susanto

Discovery Based Learning, Innovative Thinking Skills, Open-Ended, Pattern Generalization.

The aim of this study is to know the result of Discovery Based Learning Implementation through Improving Students’ innovative thinking skills in solving open-ended task of pattern generalization. The method used in the study is a combination between quantitative and qualitative method called mixed method. Learning model of discovery based learning in the research manages to improve students’ innovative thinking skills in solving open-ended task of pattern generalization indicated by the insignificant difference t-test score between the pre-test score of control class and experiment class [t (48) = -6.897, p > 0.005]. It results post-test score of control class 71.88 (SD = 5.944) and experiment class 83.88 (SD = 6.110). Hence, it indicates that both of the average post-test score are significant [(48) = -12.00, p < 0.005]. Discovery Based Learning (DBL) model in this study may improve students’ innovative thinking skills to solve open-ended task based on the result of questionnaire and interview. In addition, students are able to observe, to find new patterns and to present what they obtain.

10.22161/ijaers.5.8.10

[1] Anonimus. 2015. “21st Century Student Outcomes”. P21 Partnership For 21stCentury Learning: 3.
[2] Arikunto, S.2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[3] Arumugam, S. Et al. 2017. Local Antimagic vertexcoloring of a graph. Graphs and combinatorics (2017)
[4] Azwar, Saifuddin. 2007.Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[5] Dafik. 2015. Graph Theory, Applications And The Growth Of High-Level Thinking Skills. Jember: CGANT Research Grup Universitas Jember.
[6] Hartsfields, Nora dan Ringel, Gerhard. 1994. Pearls In Graph Theory. A Comprehensive Introduction. New York :Dover Publication, Inc.
[7] Hobri. 2010. Metologi penelitian Pengembangan (Aplikasi Pada Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika). Jember : Pena Salsabila.
[8] Krathwohl, David R. 2002. Rivision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory Into Practice, Vol. 41, No. 4, Autumn 2002.
[9] Kuswanto, Heri. 2016. Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Creativeproblem Solving Berpendekatan Open-Ended.Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMPI) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, ISSN. 2502-6526, 12 Maret 2016.
[10] Pacific Policy Research Center. 2010. 21st Century Skills for Students and Teachers. Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Research & Evaluation Division.
[11] Ruland, Judith P. 2003. Critical Thinking Standarts University of central Florida. Faculty Centre.
[12] SPSS ( 2010). SPSS base 20.0 application guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago